Self-ownership and the Libertarian Ethic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2018.v6.113Keywords:
Self-Ownership, Libertarianism, Ethics, Moral, Rights, Individual LibertyAbstract
The concept of self-ownership is intrinsect related to the concept of individual liberty and is a keystone for the libertarian ethic. In times when individual liberty is constantly violated by postivistic legislations, this paper objective is to present the libertarian ethics fundamentals, its evolution through the last 50 years and how it can be an important tool to protect individual rights. After the most important concepts and fundamentals analysis, libertarian ethics is challenged by the most relevant critics presented during this time, illustrating how they contributed to its development and highlighting points that are not fully developed or validated. Finally, the paper introduces a discussion on everyday life topics related to self-ownership, demonstrating how individual liberty is constantly violated by major contitutions worldwide and how they should be settled by libertarian author’s proposals, protecting private property and preventing agressionintiation.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
References
APEL, Karl Otto. Is the Ethics of the Ideal Communication Community a Utopia? On the Relationship between Ethics, Utopia, and the Critique of Utopia. The Communicative Ethics Controversy. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1990.
BLOCK, Walter E; SMITH, Ed.; REEL, Jordan. The Natural Rights of Children. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, v. 2, p. 85-89, 2014.
BLOCK, Walter E. Response to Wisniewski on Abortion, Round Two. LibertarianPapers, v. 3, nº.4, 2011a. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
______. Response to Wisniewski on Abortion, Round Three. LibertarianPapers, v.3, n.37, 2011b. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>.Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
______. Libertarianism, Positive Obligations and Property Abandonment: Children’s Rights. International Journal of Social Economics, v.31, n.3,Emeral Group Publishing Limited, New Orleans, 2004.
______. Toward a Libertarian Theory of Abortion. The Complete Libertarian Forum, v.10, n. 9, 1977.
BLOCK, Walter; WHITEHEAD, Roy. Compromising the Uncompromisable:A Private Property Rights Approach to Resolving the Abortion Controversy. Appalachian Journal of Law, v.4. Grundy: Appalachian School of Law, 2005.
EABRASU, Marian. A Reply to Current Critiques Formulated Against Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics. Libertarian Papers, v.1, n. 20, 2009. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 10 set 2017.
FOOT, Philippa. Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
GREENBERG, Gary. Freedom and The Law Review. The Complete Libertarian Forum. Nash Publishing, Los Angeles, 1972.
______. Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosofical Justification. The Communicative Ethics Controversy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1990.
______. Entre Naturalismo e Religião: Estudos Filosóficos. Tempo Brasileiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2007.
HOPPE, Hans-Hermann. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, 2010.
______. Demonstrated Preference and Private Property: Reply to Professor Osterfeld. Austrian Economics Newsletter, s/l, 1988.
______. The Economics and Ethics of Private Property: Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy. 2ª Edição. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, 2006.
HOUAISS, Antônio. A Nova Ortografia da Língua Portuguesa. São Paulo: Editora Ática, 1991.
HUME, David. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. The University of Adelaide, 2015. Disponível em: <https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/index.html>. Acesso em: 20 ago 2017.
KANT, Immanuel. Fundamentação da Metafísica dos Costumes. Edições 70, Lisboa, 2007.
______. Defending Argumentation Ethics: A Reply to Murphy & Callahan. StephanKinsella.com, 2002. Disponível em: <http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/defending-argumentation-ethics/>. Acesso em: 7 set 2017.
______. Estoppel: A New Justification for Individual Rights. Reason Papers 17, Houston, 1992.
______. How We Come to Own Ourselves. Mises Daily Articles, 2006. Disponível em: <https://mises.org/library/how-we-come-own-ourselves>. Acesso em: 6 ago 2017.
______. New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory. Journal of Libertarian Studies, v.12, n. 2, Center for Libertarian Studies, Burlingame, 1996a.
______. Punishment and Proportionality:The Estoppel Approach. Journal of Libertarian Studies, v.12, n.1, Center for Libertarian Studies, Burlingame, 1996b.
LAUSS, Lacombi. A Ética do Discurso em Habermas. Ideal Libertário, 2016. Disponível em: <https://ideallibertario.wordpress.com/2016/06/06/a-etica-do-discurso-em-habermas/>. Acesso em: 20 ago 2017.
LEONI, Bruno. Liberdade e a Lei: Os Limites entre a Representação e o Poder. Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, São Paulo, 2010.
LOCKE, John. Segundo Tratado do Governo Civil. Editora Vozes, Petrópolis, 2008.
LONG, Roderick. The Hoppriori Argument. Austro-Athenian Empire, 2004. Disponível em: <http://praxeology.net/unblog05-04.htm#10>. Acesso em: 10 set 2017.
MELHORAMENTOS. Dicionário Brasileiro da Língua Portuguesa. Editora Melhoramentos Ltda, 2015. Disponível em: <http://michaelis.uol.com.br/moderno-portugues/>. Acesso em: 14 out 2017.
MENG, Jude Chua Soo. Hopp(e)ing Onto New Ground: A Rothbardian Proposal for Thomistic Natural Law as the Basis for Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Praxeological Defense of Private Property. National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2002.
______. Teoria e História: Uma Interpretação da Evolução Social e Econômica. Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, São Paulo, 2014.
MOORE, George Edward. Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press, 1922.
MURPHY, Robert P.; CALLAHAN, Gene. Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethic: A Critique. Journal of Libertarian Studies, v. 20, n 2, Houston, 2006.
OSTERFELD, David. Comment on Hoppe. Austrian Economics Newsletter, s/l, 1988.
QUINN, Justin T. P..The Ethics of Abortion. Austrian Student Scholars Conference, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www2.gcc.edu/dept/econ/ASSC/Papers2013/ASSC2013-QuinnJustinTP.pdf>. Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
RACHELS, Chase. A Spontaneous Order: The Capitalist Case for a Stateless Society. Christopher Chase Rachels, s/l, 2015.
RACHELS, James. Active and Passive Euthanasia. The New England Journal of Medicine, v. 292, s/l, 1975.
REECE, Matthew. Defending the Hoppriori Argument. The Zeroth Position, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.zerothposition.com/2016/10/04/defending-hoppriori-argument/>. Acesso em: 11 set 2017.
ROTHBARD, Murray N. Beyond Is and Ought. Mises Daily Articles, 2010a. Disponível em: <https://mises.org/library/beyond-and-ought>. Acesso em: 24 set 2017.
______. A Ética da Liberdade. Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, São Paulo, 2010b.
______. The Ethics of Liberty. New York University Press, New York and London, 1998.
SINGER, Peter. Practical Ethics. 2ª Edição. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
SMITH, George H. Herbert Spencer’s Theory of Causation. Journal of Libertarian Studies, v.5, n.2, New York, 1981.
SPENCER, Herbet. Social Statics: Or The Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of Them Developed. London: John Chapman, 1851.
______. The Principles of Ethics. D. Appleton and Company, v.1, New York, 1896.
STOCKER, Barry. Hoppe: Haberma’s Anarcho-Conservative Student. Bosphorus Reflections, 2009. Disponível em: <http://istanbulfactsandideas.blogspot.com.br/2009/06/hoppe-habermas-anarcho-conservative.html>. Acesso em: 5 set 2017.
THOMSON, Judith Jarvis. A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, s/l, 1971.
TUCKNESS, Alex. Locke’s Political Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), 2016. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/locke-political/>. Acesso em: 15 out 2017.
VAN DUN, Frank. Argumentation Ethics and the Philosophy of Freedom. Libertarian Papers, v.1, n.19, 2009. Disponível em <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 15 out 2017.
WISNIEWSKI, Jakub Bozydar. A Critique of Block on Abortion and Child Abandonment. Libertarian Papers, v.2, n.16, 2010a. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
______. Rejoinder to Block’s Defense of Evictionism. Libertarian Papers, v.2, n.37, 2010b. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
BLOCK, Walter E; SMITH, Ed.; REEL, Jordan. The Natural Rights of Children. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, v. 2, p. 85-89, 2014.
BLOCK, Walter E. Response to Wisniewski on Abortion, Round Two. LibertarianPapers, v. 3, nº.4, 2011a. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
______. Response to Wisniewski on Abortion, Round Three. LibertarianPapers, v.3, n.37, 2011b. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>.Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
______. Libertarianism, Positive Obligations and Property Abandonment: Children’s Rights. International Journal of Social Economics, v.31, n.3,Emeral Group Publishing Limited, New Orleans, 2004.
______. Toward a Libertarian Theory of Abortion. The Complete Libertarian Forum, v.10, n. 9, 1977.
BLOCK, Walter; WHITEHEAD, Roy. Compromising the Uncompromisable:A Private Property Rights Approach to Resolving the Abortion Controversy. Appalachian Journal of Law, v.4. Grundy: Appalachian School of Law, 2005.
EABRASU, Marian. A Reply to Current Critiques Formulated Against Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics. Libertarian Papers, v.1, n. 20, 2009. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 10 set 2017.
FOOT, Philippa. Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
GREENBERG, Gary. Freedom and The Law Review. The Complete Libertarian Forum. Nash Publishing, Los Angeles, 1972.
______. Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosofical Justification. The Communicative Ethics Controversy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1990.
______. Entre Naturalismo e Religião: Estudos Filosóficos. Tempo Brasileiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2007.
HOPPE, Hans-Hermann. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, 2010.
______. Demonstrated Preference and Private Property: Reply to Professor Osterfeld. Austrian Economics Newsletter, s/l, 1988.
______. The Economics and Ethics of Private Property: Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy. 2ª Edição. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, 2006.
HOUAISS, Antônio. A Nova Ortografia da Língua Portuguesa. São Paulo: Editora Ática, 1991.
HUME, David. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. The University of Adelaide, 2015. Disponível em: <https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/index.html>. Acesso em: 20 ago 2017.
KANT, Immanuel. Fundamentação da Metafísica dos Costumes. Edições 70, Lisboa, 2007.
______. Defending Argumentation Ethics: A Reply to Murphy & Callahan. StephanKinsella.com, 2002. Disponível em: <http://www.stephankinsella.com/publications/defending-argumentation-ethics/>. Acesso em: 7 set 2017.
______. Estoppel: A New Justification for Individual Rights. Reason Papers 17, Houston, 1992.
______. How We Come to Own Ourselves. Mises Daily Articles, 2006. Disponível em: <https://mises.org/library/how-we-come-own-ourselves>. Acesso em: 6 ago 2017.
______. New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory. Journal of Libertarian Studies, v.12, n. 2, Center for Libertarian Studies, Burlingame, 1996a.
______. Punishment and Proportionality:The Estoppel Approach. Journal of Libertarian Studies, v.12, n.1, Center for Libertarian Studies, Burlingame, 1996b.
LAUSS, Lacombi. A Ética do Discurso em Habermas. Ideal Libertário, 2016. Disponível em: <https://ideallibertario.wordpress.com/2016/06/06/a-etica-do-discurso-em-habermas/>. Acesso em: 20 ago 2017.
LEONI, Bruno. Liberdade e a Lei: Os Limites entre a Representação e o Poder. Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, São Paulo, 2010.
LOCKE, John. Segundo Tratado do Governo Civil. Editora Vozes, Petrópolis, 2008.
LONG, Roderick. The Hoppriori Argument. Austro-Athenian Empire, 2004. Disponível em: <http://praxeology.net/unblog05-04.htm#10>. Acesso em: 10 set 2017.
MELHORAMENTOS. Dicionário Brasileiro da Língua Portuguesa. Editora Melhoramentos Ltda, 2015. Disponível em: <http://michaelis.uol.com.br/moderno-portugues/>. Acesso em: 14 out 2017.
MENG, Jude Chua Soo. Hopp(e)ing Onto New Ground: A Rothbardian Proposal for Thomistic Natural Law as the Basis for Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Praxeological Defense of Private Property. National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2002.
______. Teoria e História: Uma Interpretação da Evolução Social e Econômica. Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, São Paulo, 2014.
MOORE, George Edward. Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press, 1922.
MURPHY, Robert P.; CALLAHAN, Gene. Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethic: A Critique. Journal of Libertarian Studies, v. 20, n 2, Houston, 2006.
OSTERFELD, David. Comment on Hoppe. Austrian Economics Newsletter, s/l, 1988.
QUINN, Justin T. P..The Ethics of Abortion. Austrian Student Scholars Conference, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www2.gcc.edu/dept/econ/ASSC/Papers2013/ASSC2013-QuinnJustinTP.pdf>. Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
RACHELS, Chase. A Spontaneous Order: The Capitalist Case for a Stateless Society. Christopher Chase Rachels, s/l, 2015.
RACHELS, James. Active and Passive Euthanasia. The New England Journal of Medicine, v. 292, s/l, 1975.
REECE, Matthew. Defending the Hoppriori Argument. The Zeroth Position, 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.zerothposition.com/2016/10/04/defending-hoppriori-argument/>. Acesso em: 11 set 2017.
ROTHBARD, Murray N. Beyond Is and Ought. Mises Daily Articles, 2010a. Disponível em: <https://mises.org/library/beyond-and-ought>. Acesso em: 24 set 2017.
______. A Ética da Liberdade. Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, São Paulo, 2010b.
______. The Ethics of Liberty. New York University Press, New York and London, 1998.
SINGER, Peter. Practical Ethics. 2ª Edição. Cambridge University Press, 1993.
SMITH, George H. Herbert Spencer’s Theory of Causation. Journal of Libertarian Studies, v.5, n.2, New York, 1981.
SPENCER, Herbet. Social Statics: Or The Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of Them Developed. London: John Chapman, 1851.
______. The Principles of Ethics. D. Appleton and Company, v.1, New York, 1896.
STOCKER, Barry. Hoppe: Haberma’s Anarcho-Conservative Student. Bosphorus Reflections, 2009. Disponível em: <http://istanbulfactsandideas.blogspot.com.br/2009/06/hoppe-habermas-anarcho-conservative.html>. Acesso em: 5 set 2017.
THOMSON, Judith Jarvis. A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, s/l, 1971.
TUCKNESS, Alex. Locke’s Political Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), 2016. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/locke-political/>. Acesso em: 15 out 2017.
VAN DUN, Frank. Argumentation Ethics and the Philosophy of Freedom. Libertarian Papers, v.1, n.19, 2009. Disponível em <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 15 out 2017.
WISNIEWSKI, Jakub Bozydar. A Critique of Block on Abortion and Child Abandonment. Libertarian Papers, v.2, n.16, 2010a. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
______. Rejoinder to Block’s Defense of Evictionism. Libertarian Papers, v.2, n.37, 2010b. Disponível em: <libertarianpapers.org>. Acesso em: 5 out 2017.
Downloads
Published
2018-04-06
How to Cite
1.
Kaesemodel GP. Self-ownership and the Libertarian Ethic. MisesJournal [Internet]. 2018 Apr. 6 [cited 2024 Dec. 23];6(1). Available from: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/113
Issue
Section
Original Research Articles
