Una Teoría praxiológica de los Tipos de Interés

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2021.v9.1431

Palabras clave:

Teoría de los Tipos de Interés, Praxiologica, Historia de la economía

Resumen

Este trabajo comienza con la observación de que la teoría de la preferencia temporal pura conduce a opiniones contradictorias en cuanto al efecto de los cambios en la productividad sobre el tipo de interés. Posteriormente, examina partes de la literatura sobre intereses y concluye que la teoría de la preferencia temporal pura no es una teoría praxeológica. Entonces, el documento combina la teoría del interés de Hülsmann con la teoría del capital subjetivista de Lachmann y Kirzner y proporciona una teoría praxeológica que explica la tasa de interés. La clave de esa teoría es que la reducción de costes a través del uso de capital fijo siempre debe entenderse como relativa a los costes de la mano de obra que el capital reemplaza. Dado que la mano de obra no es especifica y el precio del trabajo, por lo tanto, también constituye los costes de producción de los bienes de capital fijo en cierta medida, el uso de capital fijo implica necesariamente un excedente empresarial en algún lugar del sistema económico. Dado que este excedente no puede desaparecer, se califica como ingreso por intereses. La magnitud de este ingreso es tal que el tipo de interés corresponde a la tasa marginal de sustitución entre el trabajo y el capital fijo, tal como se representa en las acciones empresariales.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Hendrik Hagedorn, University of Münster – Münster – Germany

Dr. Hendrik Hagedorn earned his doctoral degree in economics under Prof. van Suntum at the university of Münster, Germany. He is also a graduate physicist, a former summer fellow at the Ludwig-von-Mises Institute in Auburn, and a former fellow at Graduate Center of the German Institute for Economic Research in Berlin. In 2013, he won the Don Lavoie Memorial Essay Competition. From 2016 to 2018, he was a college professor for economics at a business school in Berlin. Currently, he is a political advisor in the German parliament. His research interest include Austrian economics, praxeology, economic modeling, and epistemology.

Citas

ANTONELLI, E. Le souvenir de Léon Walras et Carl Menger à travers leur correspondence. Economie Appliquée, v. 6, 1953.

BARRO, J. R.; SALA-I-MARTIN, X. Economic Growth. MIT Press, 2004.

BLAUG, M. The formalist revolution of the 1950s. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, v. 25, n. 2, 2003.

BÖHM-BAWERK, E. V. The Positive Theory of Capital. New York: G. E. Stechert and Co., New York, 1930.

BÖHM-BAWERK, E. V. Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economical Theory. Libertarian Press, South Holland, v. 1, 1959a.

BÖHM-BAWERK, E. V. Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economical Theory. Libertarian Press, South Holland, v. 2, 1959b.

BÖHM-BAWERK, E. V. Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economical Theory. Libertarian Press, South Holland, v. 3, 1959c.

BRAUN, M. Finance behind the veil of money. Liberty.me, 2014.

DE SOTO, J. H. Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2009.

ENDRES, M. The origins of Böhm-Bawerk’s greatest error: Theoretical points of separation from Menger. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, p. 143, p. 291–209, 1987.

FETTER, F. A. The principles of economics. The Century Co., New York, 1905.

FETTER, F. A. Interest theories old and new. American Economic Review, v. 4, n. 1, 1914.

FETTER, F. A. Economic principles. The Century Co., New York, 1915.

FETTER, F. A. Capital, Interest, and Rent: Essays in the Theory of Distribution. Kansas City: Sheed Andrew's and McNeel, 1977.

GARRISON, R. Waiting in Vienna. In: Time, Uncertainty, and Disequilibrium, Exploration of Austrian Themes. Lexington, Lexington Books, 1979.

GARRISON, R. Time and Money. The macroeconomics of capital structure. London and New York: Rout-ledge, 2001.

GLORIA-PALERMO, R. The Evolution of Austrian Economics: From Menger to Lachmann. London and New York: Rout-ledge, 1999.

GLORIA-PALERMO, R. In search of the right tool: From formalism to constructivist modelling. GREDEG Working Papers Series, v. 33, 2013.

HAYEK, F. A. Prices and Production. Routledge: London, 1935.

HERBENER, J. M. Introduction. In: The Pure Time-Preference Theory of Interest. Auburn: Ludwig-von-Mises Institute, 2011.

HOLCOMBE, R. G. Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, v. 1, n. 2, p. 45–62, 1998.

HÜLSMANN, J. G. A theory of interest. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, v. 5, n. 4, 2002.

KALECKI, M. Macrodynamic theory of business cycles. Econometrica, v. 3, p. 327–244, 1935.

KIRZNER I. K. An Essay on Capital. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1966.

KIRZNER I. K. The pure time-preference theory of interest: An attempt at clarification. In: J. M. The Pure Time-Preference Theory of Interest. Auburn: Ludwig-von-Mises Institute, [1993] 2011.

LACHMANN, L. M. Capital and its Structure. Kansas City: Sheed Andrew's and McNeel, 1978.

LEWIN, C. Capital in disequilibrium. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2011.

MENGER, C. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller, 1871.

MENGER, C. Principles of Economics. Glencoe: The Free Press, [1871] 1950.

MENGER, C. Problems of Economics and Sociology. Illinois: Urbana, [1883] 1963.

MENGER, C. Principles of Economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, [1976] 2007.

MISES, L. V. Human Action. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, [1949] 2008.

MISES, L. V. The theory of money and credit. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1954.

MOSS, L. The emergence of interest in a pure exchange economy: Notes on a theorem attributed to Ludwig von Mises. In: SPADARO, L. M. New Directions in Austrian economics. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McNeel, 1978.

MURPHY, R. P. The Austrian subjectivist theory of interest: An investigation into the history of thought. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, v. 4, n. 1, 2001.

MURPHY, R. P. Unapticipated Intertemporal Change in Theories of Interest. New York: New York University, 2003.

PELLENGAHR I. The Austrian subjectivist theory of interest. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1996.

REISMAN, G. Capitalism. Laguna Hills: TJS Books, [1990] 1998.

ROBINSON, J. The accumulation of capital. R. D. Irwin, Homewood, 1956.

ROTHBARD, M. N. Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, [1962] 2009.

ROTHBARD, M. N. Time preference. In: J. EATWELL et al (eds). The new Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics. Macmillan, London, 1987.

SCUMPETER, J. A. History of Economic Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, 1954.

WOODS JR, E. T. Why the greenbackers are wrong. Mises Daily Article. Available at: http://mises.org/daily/6391/Why-the-Greenbackers-Are-Wrong. Acessed: Mar 29 2013.

Publicado

2021-12-20

Cómo citar

1.
Hagedorn H. Una Teoría praxiológica de los Tipos de Interés. MisesJournal [Internet]. 20 de diciembre de 2021 [citado 3 de julio de 2024];9. Disponible en: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1431

Número

Sección

Special Issue 2021