Variedades de función empresarial bajo desordenes totalitários

de Ersatz al ideal

Autores/as

  • Fernando Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph D´Andrea
  • João Daniel Ruettimann Instituto Mises Brasil, São Paulo, SP, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2019.v7.1239

Palabras clave:

Emprendimiento, empreendedor, comunismo, socialismo

Resumen

El enfoque colectivista comunista del orden social se basa en la premisa de que los medios privados de producción deben ser abolidos, y en su lugar, gestionados por un poder centralizado que represente al pueblo en su conjunto. Como tal, desafía una de las características más inherentes de la condición humana,
la búsqueda innata, creativa, subjetiva y perenne de una mejor condición de vida expresada por la función empresarial. Este documento utiliza la praxiología de la Escuela Austriaca para mostrar cómo los empresarios, como motores del sistema de mercado, se convierten en los retadores más relevantes y extendidos del enfoque socialista de la economía. La búsqueda del emprendimiento desafía el ilusorio sistema socialista de economía de tres maneras: ejerciendo esta función empresarial latente, en las condiciones más desfavorables, creando mercados secundarios para abordar la escasez planificada del gobierno central; deshacerse de la mentalidad estatista generalizada en las sociedades socialistas; y poniendo en práctica el verdadero cálculo económico del mercado, en lugar del “cálculo” económico impuesto por el politburó. El artículo muestra que cuanto más hay variedades de orden social, todavía hay una similitud con el tipo de función empresarial, que es imposible de erradicar de los individuos. Por lo tanto, incluso cuando se producen regímenes totalitarios, el espíritu empresarial encuentra formas de existir y se manifiesta a pesar del tipo lacunar diferente, en las sombras, proporcionando bienestar al consumidor bajo los límites del desorden social y, sobre todo, iluminando la imposibilidad intrínseca del acuerdo de económia socialista.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Fernando, Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph D´Andrea

Fernando Antonio Monteiro Christoph D’Andrea is an Industrial Engineer, MSc in Management Engineering, and PhD Candidate in Marketing at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil with key interests in Entrepreneurship, marketing, strategic marketing, business strategy

João Daniel Ruettimann, Instituto Mises Brasil, São Paulo, SP, Brasil

B.A in International Relations, masters in international commerce, project management specialist, post-graduate in international commerce, and post-graduate, latu sensu, in Austrian Economics. Specialist member of Instituto Mises Brasil (IMB).

Citas

ACEVEDO, R. A.; CIROCCO, L. H,; D’ANDREA, F. A. M. C. Multipoverty in Venezuela. MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics, v. 6 (Special Issue), 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2018.v0.949

ÅSLUND, A. How entrepreneurship could be promoted after the collapse of a socialist economic system. Journal of Asian Economics, v. 23, n. 2, p. 157–167, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2011.09.003

BARBIERI, F. História do Debate do Cálculo Econômico Socialista (1a Edição). São Paulo: Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, 2013.

BAUMOL, W. J. Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive. Journal of Political Economy, v. 98, n. 5, Part 1 (October), p. 893–921, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261712

BAUMOL, W. J. Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, v. 11, n. 1, p. 3–22, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00014-X

BESANÇON, A. Le Malheur du siècle - sur le communisme , le nazisme et l’unicité de la shoah. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard, 1998.

BOETTKE, P. J. Why Perestroika failed: the politics and economics of socialist transformation. London: Routledge, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203419472

BOETTKE, P. J.; COYNE, C. J.; LEESON, P. T. Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, v. 67, n. 2, p. 331–358, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00573.x

BOHM-BAWERK, E. V. Capital And Interest: A Critical History of Economical Theory. London: MacMillan and Co, 1890.

BOSTAPH, S. Driving the market process: “Alertness” versus Innovation and Creative Destruction. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, v. 16, n. 4, p. 421–458, 2013.

BYLUND, P. L. The problem of production: a new theory of the firm. London: Routledge, 2016.

BYLUND, P. L. The Management Problem of Socialism: Cost at the Expense of Value. In: MCCAFFREY, M. (ed.). The Economic Theory of Costs Foundations and New Directions. London: Routledge, 2018.

CACHANOSKY, N. The Cost of Populism in Argentina, 2003-2015. MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics, v. 6 (Special Issue), 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2018.v0.965

CALDEIRA, J. História do Brasil com empreendedores. São Paulo: Mameluco, 2009.

CHAMBERLIN, A.,; MANSIH, G. P. Savings, Private Property and Sound Money. MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics, v. 6 (Special Issue), 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2018.v0.1091

COURTOIS, S. et al. The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression. London: Harvard University Press, 1999.

D’ANDREA, F. A. M. C. Entrepreneurs as source of Innovation: A Strategic Marketing Perspective ((Unpublished Manuscript)), 2019.

D’ANDREA. A. M. C.; RUETTIMANN, J. D. Entrepreneurship under Communism: Economic Calculation, (Black) Markets, & Statist Mentality. Revista Estudios Libertarios, v. 2, n. 1, forthcomming, 2019.

DEELY, J. Purely Objective Reality. Berlin: Walter de Gruyer GmbH & Co, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078099

DEL NOCE, A. The Crisis of Modernity. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2015.

DEL NOCE, A. The Age of Secularization. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017.

DJILAS, M. The New Class – an Analysis of the Communist System. New York: Frederick Prager, 1957.

ELERT, N.; HENREKSON, M. Evasive entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, v. 47, n. 1, p. 95–113, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9725-x

ELLIOT, J. E. Disintegration of the Soviet politico‐economic system. International Journal of Social Economics, v. 22, n. 3, p. 31–60, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299510146745

ENGELS, F. Principles of Communism. Washington: The FreeCapitalist Project, 1874. Retrieved from: http://www.hillerickson.com/webly/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/principles-of-communism11.pdf. Acessed at: Feb 15 2019

FOSS, N. J.; KLEIN, P. G. Organizing entrepreneurial judgment : a new approach to the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021173

FOSS, N. J.; KLEIN, P. G. Entrepreneurial Discovery or Creation? In Search of the Middle Ground. Academy of Management Review, v. 42, n. 4, p. 733–736, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0046

HAMILTON, A.; MADISON, J.; JAY, J. The Federalist Papers. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230102019

HANLEY, R. P. Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

HAVEL, V. Open Letters – Selected Writings 1965-1990. New York: Vintage Books, 1992.

HAYEK, F. A. von. Collectivist Economic Planning Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD, 1935.

HAYEK, F. A. von. Individualism and Economic order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1948.

HAYEK, F. A. von. The Intellectuals and Socialism. The University of Chicago Law Review, v. 16, n. 3, 1949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1597903

HAYEK, F. A. von. The Road to Serfdom. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.

HELLMAN, J. S.; JONES, G.; KAUFMANN, D. Seize the state, seize the day: state capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, v. 31, n. 4, p. 751–773, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2003.09.006

HENKEN, T. Entrepreneurship, informality, and the second economy: Cuba’s underground economy in comparative perspective’. Cuba in Transition, 2005. Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy. Retrieved from https://ascecuba.org//c/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/v15-henken.pdf. Acessed at: Jan 10 2019.

HOLCOMBE, R. G. The origins of entrepreneurial opportunities. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 16, n. 1, p. 25–43, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022953123111

HOPPE, H.-H. Socialism: A property or knowledge problem? The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 9, n. 1, p. 143–149, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101888

HOPPE, H.-H. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. Norwell: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2010.

IBRAHIM, G.; GALT, V. Bye-bye central planning, hello market hiccups: institutional transition in Romania. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 26, n. 1, p. 105–118, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.1.105

JOHANSSON, Dan; MALM, A. Economics Doctoral Programs Still Elide Entrepreneurship. Econ Journal Watch, v. 14, n. 2, p. 196–217, 2017.

KIRZNER, I. M. Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, 1973.

KIRZNER, I. M. The alert and creative entrepreneur: a clarification. Small Business Economics, v. 32, n. 2, p.145–152, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9153-7

KLEIN, P. G. The Capitalist & The Entrepreneur. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2010.

KLEIN, P. G. An Austrian Perspective on Firms and Markets: My Contributions to Entrepreneurship Theory. In: AUDRETSCH, D. B.; LEHMANN E. E. (eds.). The Routledge Companion to the Makers of Modern Entrepreneurship. New York: Routledge, 2017.

KUCHEROV, S. Property in the Soviet Union. The American Journal of Comparative Law, v. 11, n. 31962. LENIN, V. I. Once Again On the Trade Unions, the Current Situation and the Mistakes of Trotsky and Buhkarin. Lenin’s Collected Works. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1965.

MARX, K. The Communist Manifesto (World Publ). Project Gutenberg Consortia Center, 1848. Retrieved from http://115.248.176.49:8001/jspui/bitstream/123456789/640/1/marx-communist-109.pdf. Acessed at: Feb 17 2019

MARX, K.; ENGELS, F. The German Ideology. Great Books in Philosophy. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1988.

MCCLOSKEY, D. N. The Bourgeois Virtues – Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226556673.001.0001

MCMILLAN, J.; WOODRUFF, C. The Central Role of Entrepreneurs in Transition Economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 16, n. 3, p. 153–170, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/089533002760278767

MENGER, C. Principles of Economics. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2007.

MISES, L. von. Socialism An Economic and Sociological Analysis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951.

MISES, L. von. The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality. New York: D. van Nostrand Company, Inc, 1956.

MISES, L. von. Planning for Freedom and twelve other essays and addresses (Memorial E). South Holland: Libertarian Press, 1974.

MISES, L. von. Economic Calculation in a Socialist Commonwhealth. Auburn: Mises Institute, 1990.

MISES, L. von. Human action: the scholar’s edition. Auburn: Mises Institute, 1998.

NOVAKOVIĆ, A.,; DOSTANIĆ, D. The anti-capitalist mentality and ill-fated transition. MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics, v. 6 (Special Issue), 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2018.v0.563

PHELAN, S. E. Austrian theories of entrepreneurship: Insights from complexity theory. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 29, n. 3, p. 277–297, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-015-0302-3

PORTES, A.; BÖRÖCZ, J. The Informal Sector under Capitalism and State Socialism: A Preliminary Comparison. Social Justice. Dynamic of the Informal Economy, v. 15, n. 3-4, p. 17-28, 1988.

REMNICK, D. Lenin’s Tomb: The Last Days of the Soviet Empire (First Vint). New York: Vintage Books, 1994.

RÖËPKE, W. A humane Economy – the social framework of the free Market (3rd.). Wilmington: ISI Books, 1998.

ROTHBARD, M. N. The end of socialism and the calculation debate revisited. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 5, n. 2, p. 51–76, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02426928

ROTHBARD, M. N. The ethics of liberty. New York: NYU Press, 2002.

ROTHBARD, M. N. Man, Economy, and State. A Treatise on Economic Principles with Power and Market Government and the Economy (Second). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2004.

SALERNO, J. T. Reply to Leland B. Yeager on Mises and Hayek on Calculation and Knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 7, n. 2, p. 111–125, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101945

SAMPSON, S. L. The Second Economy of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 493, p. 120–136, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716287493001009

SATTER, D. Age of Delirium: the decline and fall of the Soviet Union. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.

TISMANEANU, V. Do Comunismo: O Destino De Uma Religião Política. Campinas: Vide Editorial, 2015.

UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS. Constitution (Fundamental law) of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Moscow, Russia: Union of Soviet Socialist Republics – USSR, 1936. Retrieved from: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1936/12/05.htm. Acessed at: Feb 18 2019

VOEGELIN, E. Science, Politics And Gnosticism. Wilmington: ISI Books, 2004.

YEAGER, L. B. Mises and Hayek on calculation and knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 7, n. 2, p. 93–109, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101944

Publicado

2019-11-07

Cómo citar

1.
Fernando, Ruettimann JD. Variedades de función empresarial bajo desordenes totalitários: de Ersatz al ideal. MisesJournal [Internet]. 7 de noviembre de 2019 [citado 3 de julio de 2024];7(3). Disponible en: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/1239

Número

Sección

Original Research Articles