Land-Locked:

A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights

Authors

  • Roderick T. Long

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2015.v3.769

Keywords:

Property Rights, Lockeans, Mutualism, Georgians

Abstract

Long examines the nature of property rights from the perspective of the requirements imposed by the residual rights of the community at large; for Georgians, the community itself plays an active role, for example, the famous Henry George’s “Single Tax” on land values, while mutualism, in the tradition of Benjamin Tucker, tend to view the free land as only those communal land without owner, over which the latter property rights of mankind are dormant. Long criticizes the view of Kevin Carson – on the pragmatic benefits of mutualism on the Georgians and Lockean rivals – as a philosopher, restricting his attention to a philosophical problem concerning property rights he identifies in that author. The central point of contention is that, in the view of Long, the Lockean approach is the only defensible under the libertarian point of view.

Downloads

Metrics

PDF views
968
Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017Jan 2018Jul 2018Jan 2019Jul 2019Jan 2020Jul 2020Jan 2021Jul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024Jan 2025Jul 2025Jan 202645
|

Published

2015-12-01

How to Cite

1.
Long RT. Land-Locked:: A Critique of Kevin Carson on Property Rights. MisesJournal [Internet]. 2015 Dec. 1 [cited 2025 Apr. 6];3(2):345-52. Available from: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/769

Issue

Section

Epistemology & Ethics