Os conceitos de “Incerteza” para Austríacos e Pós-Keynesianos:
O que há por trás do debate?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30800/mises.2018.v6.865Palavras-chave:
Incerteza, Escola Austríaca, Pós-Keynesianos, O’Driscoll Jr. e Rizzo, DavidsonResumo
Distintas em vários aspectos, a Escola Austríaca e a Pós-Keynesiana consideram fundamental a ideia de “incerteza”. Este trabalho parte de uma perspectiva Austríaca para explicar em que medida a abordagem Pós-Keynesiana falha em entender a ideia de “incerteza”, com destaque à formulação de políticas governamentais. Em especial, o trabalho aborda uma tentativa de “conciliação” entre as duas escolas feita por Gerald O’Driscoll Jr. e Mario Rizzo, que gerou um debate entre diversos economistas Austríacos e Paul Davidson, um autor Pós-Keynesiano. Como causa e solução da controvérsia, será destacada a grande influência sobre os autores de Economics of Time and Ignorance, a saber, o caráter contestador da teoria de Ludwig Lachmann em relação à própria Escola Austríaca, considerando a incerteza como um fato que inviabiliza a observação de uma efetiva coordenação entre as ações de agentes dispersos.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Métricas
Carregando Métricas ...
Referências
ANDRADE III, Paulo Hora. Uma reflexão sobre a história recente da Escola Austríaca. MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics, v. 6, n. 2, 2018.
BARBIERI, Fábio. História do debate do cálculo econômico socialista. São Paulo: Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, 2013.
BARBIERI, Fabio. O processo de mercado na escola austríaca moderna. 2001. Tese de Doutorado. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 2001.
BOEHM, S; FARMER, K. Why the acrimony? Reply to Davidson, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
BOETTKE, Peter. Handbook on contemporary Austrian economics. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.
BRESSER-PEREIRA, Luiz Carlos. Os dois métodos e o núcleo duro da teoria econômica. Revista de Economia Política, v. 29, n. 2, p. 163, 2009.
CALDWELL, Bruce J. Post-Keynesian methodology: an assessment. Review of Political Economy, v. 1, n. 1, p. 43-64, 1989.
CALDWELL, Bruce; HUTCHISON, Terence. CONTRA KEYNES AND CAMBRIDGE. The collected works of Hayek v.9. Economic Affairs, v. 16, n. 2, 1996.
CARVALHO, Fernando JJ Cardim de. Equilíbrio fiscal e política econômica keynesiana. Análise econômica, v. 26, n. 50, 2008.
DAVIDSON, P. Austrians and Post Keynesians on economic reality: Rejoinder to critics, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
DAVIDSON, P. Financial Markets, Money and the Real World. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2002.
DAVIDSON, P. The economics of ignorance or ignorance of economics?. Critical Review, 1989.
DEMPSTER, Gregory M. Austrians and post keynesians: the questions of ignorance and uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, v. 2, n. 4, p. 73-81, 1999.
GARRISON, Roger W. The Austrian School. Snowdon B. and Vane HR, 2005.
GERRARD, B. Method and methodology in Keynes’s General Theory. A Second Edition of the General Theory. London: Routledge, 1997, p. 166-202.
HAYEK, F.A. Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948.
HAYEK, F.A. Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
HAYEK, F. A. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1979.
HAYEK, F.A. Denationalization of Money - The Argument Refined: An Analysis of the Theory and Practice of Concurrent Currencies. Londres: Institute for Economic Affairs, 1976.
KEYNES, J.M. General theory of employment, interest and money. Har-court, Brace and Co., New York, 1936.
KIRZNER, Israel M. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
LACHMANN, L.M. Capital, Expectations and the Market Process: Essays on the Theory of the Market Theory. Kansas: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1977.
LACHMANN, L.M. Macro-economic thinking and the market economy. Londres: Institute of economic affairs, 1973.
LACHMANN, L.M. The Market as an Economic Process. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1986.
LEESON, Peter; BOETTKE, Peter. Was Mises Right?. Review of Social Economy, v. 64, p.247-265, 2006.
MENGER, Carl. Principles of Economics. New York: New York University, 1976.
MINSKY, H.P.; KAUFMAN, H. Stabilizing an unstable economy. Nova York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
MISES, L. Human action. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2004.
O'DRISCOLL JR, G.P.; RIZZO, M. J. Austrian economics re-examined: the economics of time and ignorance. Londres: Routledge, 1996.
PRYCHITKO, L. After Davidson, who needs the Austrians? Reply to Davidson, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
RUNDE, J. Paul Davidson and the Austrians: Reply to Davidson, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
SALERNO, J.T. Ludwig von Mises as social rationalist. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 4, n. 1, p. 26-54, 1990.
SALERNO, J.T. Mises and Hayek dehomogenized. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 6, n. 2, 1993.
TORR, C. What can Austrian economists learn from the post Keynesians? Reply to Davidson, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
VAUGHN, K.I. Austrian economics in America: The migration of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
BARBIERI, Fábio. História do debate do cálculo econômico socialista. São Paulo: Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, 2013.
BARBIERI, Fabio. O processo de mercado na escola austríaca moderna. 2001. Tese de Doutorado. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 2001.
BOEHM, S; FARMER, K. Why the acrimony? Reply to Davidson, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
BOETTKE, Peter. Handbook on contemporary Austrian economics. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010.
BRESSER-PEREIRA, Luiz Carlos. Os dois métodos e o núcleo duro da teoria econômica. Revista de Economia Política, v. 29, n. 2, p. 163, 2009.
CALDWELL, Bruce J. Post-Keynesian methodology: an assessment. Review of Political Economy, v. 1, n. 1, p. 43-64, 1989.
CALDWELL, Bruce; HUTCHISON, Terence. CONTRA KEYNES AND CAMBRIDGE. The collected works of Hayek v.9. Economic Affairs, v. 16, n. 2, 1996.
CARVALHO, Fernando JJ Cardim de. Equilíbrio fiscal e política econômica keynesiana. Análise econômica, v. 26, n. 50, 2008.
DAVIDSON, P. Austrians and Post Keynesians on economic reality: Rejoinder to critics, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
DAVIDSON, P. Financial Markets, Money and the Real World. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2002.
DAVIDSON, P. The economics of ignorance or ignorance of economics?. Critical Review, 1989.
DEMPSTER, Gregory M. Austrians and post keynesians: the questions of ignorance and uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, v. 2, n. 4, p. 73-81, 1999.
GARRISON, Roger W. The Austrian School. Snowdon B. and Vane HR, 2005.
GERRARD, B. Method and methodology in Keynes’s General Theory. A Second Edition of the General Theory. London: Routledge, 1997, p. 166-202.
HAYEK, F.A. Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948.
HAYEK, F.A. Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
HAYEK, F. A. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1979.
HAYEK, F.A. Denationalization of Money - The Argument Refined: An Analysis of the Theory and Practice of Concurrent Currencies. Londres: Institute for Economic Affairs, 1976.
KEYNES, J.M. General theory of employment, interest and money. Har-court, Brace and Co., New York, 1936.
KIRZNER, Israel M. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
LACHMANN, L.M. Capital, Expectations and the Market Process: Essays on the Theory of the Market Theory. Kansas: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1977.
LACHMANN, L.M. Macro-economic thinking and the market economy. Londres: Institute of economic affairs, 1973.
LACHMANN, L.M. The Market as an Economic Process. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1986.
LEESON, Peter; BOETTKE, Peter. Was Mises Right?. Review of Social Economy, v. 64, p.247-265, 2006.
MENGER, Carl. Principles of Economics. New York: New York University, 1976.
MINSKY, H.P.; KAUFMAN, H. Stabilizing an unstable economy. Nova York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
MISES, L. Human action. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2004.
O'DRISCOLL JR, G.P.; RIZZO, M. J. Austrian economics re-examined: the economics of time and ignorance. Londres: Routledge, 1996.
PRYCHITKO, L. After Davidson, who needs the Austrians? Reply to Davidson, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
RUNDE, J. Paul Davidson and the Austrians: Reply to Davidson, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
SALERNO, J.T. Ludwig von Mises as social rationalist. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 4, n. 1, p. 26-54, 1990.
SALERNO, J.T. Mises and Hayek dehomogenized. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 6, n. 2, 1993.
TORR, C. What can Austrian economists learn from the post Keynesians? Reply to Davidson, Critical Review. Journal of Politics and Society, 1993.
VAUGHN, K.I. Austrian economics in America: The migration of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Downloads
Publicado
2018-11-26
Como Citar
1.
Andrade III PH. Os conceitos de “Incerteza” para Austríacos e Pós-Keynesianos:: O que há por trás do debate?. MisesJournal [Internet]. 26º de novembro de 2018 [citado 22º de julho de 2024];6(3). Disponível em: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/865
Edição
Seção
Artigos de Pesquisa
Licença
Este periódico está licenciado sob uma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
