MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal <p dir="ltr">MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics , scholarly and peer-reviewed journal (print and on-line) published three times a year by Instituto Mises Brasil which was founded in 2007. The topics covered in the journal mainly include (but not limit to): Epistemology and Ethics, Economics, Methodology and Praxeology, History of Economic Thought, Society, Legislation and Politics, Culture and Freedom.&nbsp;</p> <p dir="ltr">The journal is published in Portuguese, Spanish and English. The e-journal provides free and open access to its content on our website.</p> Instituto Mises Brasil en-US MISES: Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, Law and Economics 2318-0811 <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" rel="license"><img style="border-width: 0;" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" alt="Creative Commons License"></a><br>&nbsp; This Journal is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" rel="license">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.</p> Ciência Econômica e o Método Austríaco https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/221 <p>Resumo do Livro: Ciência Econômica e o Método Austríaco</p> <p>Autor: Hans-Hermann Hoppe</p> <p>ISBN: 978-85-62816-18-5</p> Douglas Cavalheiro ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2020-06-01 2020-06-01 6 1 265 267 10.30800/mises.2013.v1.221 A Praxeology and Internal and External Criticism in Caldwell and Sen: https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/20 <p>The praxeology formulated by Ludwig von Mises and defined as a general theory of human action, categorizes it as a science in which all individual actions are a priori rational. The axiom all the action is rational is deductively implied by the concept that individuals deliberate act to decrease in personal distress. Such provisions have generated controversy, is the methodological field and the epistemological field. At first, the criticisms are developed which is conventionally external praxeology critical, therefore, by methodological differences. In the second, the challenges consist of the axioms of rationality and logical deductions under the praxeological methodology. So, are called internal criticism of praxeology Mises. Here, we present such concepts and differences, concluding that the road to praxeology is not necessarily in its refutation, and yes, the evolution towards an essentially conceptualized by Bruce Caldwell pluralistic methodological way.</p> Felipe Rosa da Silva ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2018-04-19 2018-04-19 6 1 10.30800/mises.2018.v6.20 A Brazilian Adam Smith https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/64 <p>Adam Smith’s seminal work, The Wealth of Nations, was introduced to Brazilian readers by an autodidatic “economist”, José da Silva Lisboa, at the beginning of the 19th century. The paper intends to reconstruct the reception of Smith’s ideas in Brazil (and Portugal), through the early works of José da Silva Lisboa. He was a remarkable intellectual, liberal by instinct besides a government official, who was largely responsible for the “economic opening” of Brazilian ports to foreign trade (decreed by the Portuguese Regent, Prince D. João, in 1808, at his arrival in Brazil). He was honored with the title of Viscount of Cairu (who became the patron of the Brazilian economists in the 20th century). He translated, incorporated, copied and transformed many Smithian ideas in his books (published in Portugal and Brazil, by Imprensa Régia), adapting them to a colonial economy and a backward agricultural environment. He suggested, among other original features, the existence of a fourth factor of production (besides land, labor and capital): knowledge, which could be considered an anticipation of modern conceptual evolution in economic thinking.</p> Paulo Roberto Almeida ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2018-04-17 2018-04-17 6 1 10.30800/mises.2018.v6.64 Self-ownership and the Libertarian Ethic https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/113 <p>The concept of self-ownership is intrinsect related to the concept of individual liberty and is a keystone for the libertarian ethic. In times when individual liberty is constantly violated by postivistic legislations, this paper objective is to present the libertarian ethics fundamentals, its evolution through the last 50 years and how it can be an important tool to protect individual rights. After the most important concepts and fundamentals analysis, libertarian ethics is challenged by the most relevant critics presented during this time, illustrating how they contributed to its development and highlighting points that are not fully developed or validated. Finally, the paper introduces a discussion on everyday life topics related to self-ownership, demonstrating how individual liberty is constantly violated by major contitutions worldwide and how they should be settled by libertarian author’s proposals, protecting private property and preventing agressionintiation.</p> Gustavo Poletti Kaesemodel ##submission.copyrightStatement## http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2018-04-06 2018-04-06 6 1 10.30800/mises.2018.v6.113 Editorial v.6 n.1 (2018) https://revistamises.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/299 <p>Editorial v.6 n.1 (2018) video of this first edition Ahead of Print</p> Adriano de Carvalho Paranaiba ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2018-03-22 2018-03-22 6 1